This is a good article. Follow the link for more information. Erasmus used several Greek manuscripts housed in Basel, but some verses in Revelation he translated from the Latin Vulgate. Tyndale new testament pdf issued editions in 1516, 1519, 1522, 1527, and 1536.
It did not happen, and Erasmus did not continue contacts with Badius. At that time Erasmus did not think about a Greek New Testament. It is uncertain when Erasmus decided to prepare his edition of the Greek New Testament, but on a visit to Basel in August 1514 he contacted Johann Froben. As a result, in July 1515 Erasmus came to Basel and started his work. Erasmus did not take any Greek manuscripts to Basel, hoping to find some there.
He borrowed some manuscripts from the Dominican Library at the Basel. In every book of the New Testament he compared three or four manuscripts, except the last book, Book of Revelation. Unfortunately, this manuscript was not complete, it lacked the final leaf, which contained the last six verses of the book. Even in other parts of the Book of Revelation and other books of the New Testament Erasmus occasionally introduced self-created Greek text material taken from the Vulgate. There is no such word in Greek language as ακαθαρτητος. And he trembling and astonished said, Lord, what will you have me to do?
Novum Instrumentum omne, diligenter ab Erasmo Rot. Origenis, Chrysostomi, Cyrilli, Vulgarij, Hieronymi, Cypriani, Ambrosij, Hilaryj, Augustini, una cum Annotationibus, quae lectorem doceant, quid qua ratione mutatum sit. This title must refer to the Latin text of Vulgate, not to any Greek text, because at that time there was not a printed edition of the Greek New Testament in circulation. I perceived that that teaching which is our salvation was to be had in a much purer and more lively form if sought at the fountain-head and drawn from the actual sources than from pools and runnels.
It was a bilingual edition, the Greek text was in a left column, Latin in a right column, and it is clear, the Greek text was not the first target of this edition, it was the Latin text of Vulgate. The reception of the first edition was mixed, but within three years a second was made. The text was changed in about 400 places, with most—though not all—of the typographical errors corrected. Some new erroneus readings were added to the text.
In this edition the text of Jerome’s Vulgate Erasmus replaced by his own more elegant translation. The Latin translation had a good reception. After this edition, Erasmus was involved in many polemics and controversies. Particularly objectionable were the annotations from the universities of Cambridge and Oxford. Erasmus replied that he had not found it in any Greek manuscript. Stunica answered that Latin manuscripts are more reliable than Greek.
Erasmus replied that he had not found any Greek manuscript that contained these words, he answered that this was a case not of omission, but simply of non-addition. He showed that even some Latin manuscripts did not contain these words. Greek text Erasmus departed from the common readings of the Vulgate. An often repeated story is that Erasmus included it, because he felt bound by a promise to include it if a manuscript was found that contained it. Henk Jan de Jonge, a specialist in Erasmian studies, stated that there is no explicit evidence that supports this frequently made assertion concerning a specific promise made by Erasmus. The third edition differed in 118 places from the second.